Index and Repeat Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Older versus Younger Patients: A Propensity-Score Matching Analysis.

Catheter ablation is a well-established rhythm control therapy in atrial fibrillation (AF). Although the prevalence of AF increases dramatically with age, the prognosis and safety profile of index and repeat ablation procedures remain unclear in the older population. The primary endpoint of this study was to assess the arrhythmia recurrence, reablation and complication rates in older patients. Secondary endpoints were the identification of independent predictors of arrhythmia recurrence and reablation, including information on pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection and other atrial foci. Older (n=129, ≥70 years) and younger (n=129, <70 years) patients were compared using a propensity-score matching analysis based on age, gender, obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, dilated left atrium, severe obstructive sleep apnea, cardiac disease, left systolic ventricular function, AF pattern and ablation technique. Arrhythmia recurrence and reablation were evaluated in both groups using a Cox regression analysis in order to identify predictors. During a 30-month follow-up period, there were no significant differences between older and younger patients in the arrhythmia-free survival (65.1% and 59.7%; log-rank test p=0.403) and complication (10.1% and 10.9%; p>0.999) rates after the index ablation. However, the reablation rate was significantly different (46.7% and 69.2%; p<0.05, respectively). In those patients who underwent reablation procedure (redo subgroups), there were no differences in the incidence of PV reconnection (38.1% redo-older and 27.8% redo-younger patients; p=0.556). However, the redo-older patients had lower reconnected PVs per patient (p<0.01) and lower atrial foci (2.3 and 3.7; p<0.01) than the redo-younger patients. A further important finding was that age was not an independent predictor of arrhythmia recurrence or reablation. Our data reveal that the AF index ablation in older patients had a similar efficacy and safety profile to younger patients. Therefore, age alone must not be considered a prognostic factor for AF ablation but the presence of limiting factors such as frailty and multiple comorbidities.

Repeat cryoablation as a redo procedure for atrial fibrillation ablation: Is it a good choice?

BACKGROUND: Ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF), both cryoablation ablation (CBA) and radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA), have demonstrated to be safe and effective. About 1 in 3 patients may face a redo due to recurrence and the best technique is unknown. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of CBA as a repeat procedure in patients with prior CBA or RFCA. METHODS: A nation-wide CBA registry (RECABA) was analyzed and patients were compared who had previously undergone CBA (Prior-CB) or RFCA (Prior-RF). The primary endpoint was AF recurrence at 12 months after a 3-month blanking period. A survival analysis was performed, univariate and multivariate Cox models were also built. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were included. Thirty-three (44.6%) were in the Prior-CB group and 41 (55.4%) in the Prior-RF. There were more reconnected pulmonary veins in the Prior-RF than in Prior-CB group (40.4% vs.16.5%, p = 0.0001). The 12-month Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from AF recurrence after the blanking period was 61.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 41.4-75.8%) in the Prior-CB, and 89.2% (95% CI 73.6-95.9%) in the Prior-RF group (p = 0.002). Multivariate Cox regression pointed Prior-CB as the sole independent predictor of AF recurrence, with an adjusted HR of 2.67 (95% CI 1.05-6.79). CONCLUSIONS: Repeat CBA shows higher rates of AF recurrences compared to CBA after a previous RFCA despite presenting less reconnected veins at the procedure. These data suggest that patients with AF recurrence after CBA may benefit from other ablation techniques after a recurrence. RECABA is registered at clinicaltrials.gov with the Unique Identifier NCT02785991.

Reablation in Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence and Pulmonary Vein Reconnection: Cryoballoon versus Radiofrequency as Index Ablation Procedures.

Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is a well-established rhythm control therapy in atrial fibrillation (AF). Currently, there is no consensus on which ablation technique to use for the first procedure, cryoballoon (CB) or radiofrequency (RF). A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 1055 patients who underwent a first ablation, to assess both techniques based on the need for reablation. Patients with CB (n = 557) and RF (n = 498) ablations were clinically characterized and the need for reablation during a 30-month follow-up was used as the primary endpoint. Independent variables were analyzed to identify potential predictors. The need for reablation was significantly lower in the CB group than in the RF group (hazard ratio = 0.45 and 95% confident interval = 0.32−0.61; p < 0.001); in both paroxysmal and persistent AF, using a full-adjusted regression Cox model by age, sex, smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, severe obstructive sleep apnea, dilated left atrium, persistent AF and early recurrence. RF ablation, dilated left atrium, persistent AF and early recurrence were identified as independent predictors of reablation. In addition, the CB-redo subgroup had a lower PV reconnection than the RF-redo subgroup. In conclusion, CB ablation suggests a reduction in the need for reablation and lower PV reconnection during the follow-up than RF ablation.

Bloqueo auriculoventricular en pacientes en tratamiento con fármacos bradicardizantes. Variables predictoras de la necesidad de implante de marcapasos / Atrioventricular block in patients undergoing treatment with bradycardic drugs. Predictors of pacemaker requirement

INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: El bloqueo auriculoventricular (BAV) en presencia de fármacos bradicardizantes (FBZ) puede ser reversible, y está en controversia el implante de marcapasos. El objetivo es analizar la necesidad de tratamiento con marcapasos a medio plazo, tras la suspensión de los FBZ, e identificar factores predictores. MÉTODOS: Se estudió a una cohorte de pacientes que acudieron a urgencias con BAV de alto grado mientras tomaban FBZ. Se estudió la persistencia de BAV tras la interrupción del fármaco, la recurrencia en los pacientes con resolución del BAV y las variables predictoras asociadas con la necesidad de marcapasos a los 3 años de seguimiento. RESULTADOS: De 127 pacientes (edad, 79 [71-83] años), en 60 (47,2%) se resolvió el BAV; de estos, en 40 (66,6%) el BAV recurrió en los 24 meses de seguimiento medio; 107 pacientes (84,3%) tuvieron indicación de implante de marcapasos pese a suspenderse los FBZ. Las variables asociadas con la necesidad de marcapasos a los 3 años en el multivariable fueron: frecuencia cardiaca<35 lpm (OR=8,12; IC95%, 1,82-36,17); síntomas diferentes del síncope (OR=4,09; IC95%, 1,18-14,13) y QRS ancho (OR=5,65; IC95%, 1,77-18,04). El tratamiento con antiarrítmicos no se asoció con necesidad de marcapasos (OR=0,12; IC95%, 0,02-0,66). CONCLUSIONES: Más del 80% de los pacientes con BAV secundario a FBZ precisan implante de marcapasos a pesar de suspenderlos; los predictores son el QRS ancho, la frecuencia cardiaca <35 lpm y la presentación clínica distinta del síncope

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Atrioventricular block (AVB) in the presence of bradycardic drugs (BD) can be reversible, and pacemaker implantation is controversial. Our objective was to analyze the pacemaker implantation rate in the mid-term, after BD suspension, and to identify predictive factors. METHODS: We performed a cohort study that included patients attending the emergency department with high-grade AVB in the context of BD. We studied the persistence of AVB after BD discontinuation, recurrence in patients with AVB resolution, and the predictive variables associated with pacemaker requirement at 3 years. RESULTS: Of 127 patients included (age, 79 [71-83] years), BAV resolved in 60 (47.2%); among these patients, recurrence occurred during the 24-month median follow-up in 40 (66.6%). Pacemaker implantation was required in 107 patients (84.3%), despite BD discontinuation. On multivariable analysis, the variables associated with pacemaker need at 3 years were heart rate <35 bpm (OR, 8.12; 95%CI, 1.82-36.17), symptoms other than syncope (OR, 4.09; 95%CI, 1.18-14.13), and wide QRS (OR, 5.65; 95%CI, 1.77-18.04). Concomitant antiarrhythmic treatment was associated with AVB resolution (OR, 0.12; 95%CI, 0.02-0.66). CONCLUSIONS: More than 80% of patients with AVB secondary to BD require pacemaker implantation despite drug discontinuation. Predictive variables were wide QRS, heart rate <35 bpm, and clinical presentation other than syncope

Atrioventricular block in patients undergoing treatment with bradycardic drugs. Predictors of pacemaker requirement.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Atrioventricular block (AVB) in the presence of bradycardic drugs (BD) can be reversible, and pacemaker implantation is controversial. Our objective was to analyze the pacemaker implantation rate in the mid-term, after BD suspension, and to identify predictive factors. METHODS: We performed a cohort study that included patients attending the emergency department with high-grade AVB in the context of BD. We studied the persistence of AVB after BD discontinuation, recurrence in patients with AVB resolution, and the predictive variables associated with pacemaker requirement at 3 years. RESULTS: Of 127 patients included (age, 79 [71-83] years), BAV resolved in 60 (47.2%); among these patients, recurrence occurred during the 24-month median follow-up in 40 (66.6%). Pacemaker implantation was required in 107 patients (84.3%), despite BD discontinuation. On multivariable analysis, the variables associated with pacemaker need at 3 years were heart rate <35 bpm (OR, 8.12; 95%CI, 1.82-36.17), symptoms other than syncope (OR, 4.09; 95%CI, 1.18-14.13), and wide QRS (OR, 5.65; 95%CI, 1.77-18.04). Concomitant antiarrhythmic treatment was associated with AVB resolution (OR, 0.12; 95%CI, 0.02-0.66). CONCLUSIONS: More than 80% of patients with AVB secondary to BD require pacemaker implantation despite drug discontinuation. Predictive variables were wide QRS, heart rate <35 bpm, and clinical presentation other than syncope.

Rentabilidad del estudio genético mediante técnicas de next-generation sequencing masiva de pacientes con miocardiopatía arritmogénica de alto riesgo / Usefulness of genetic study by next-generation sequencing in high-risk arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy

Introducción y objetivos: La miocardiopatía arritmogénica del ventrículo derecho (MCAVD) es una cardiopatía hereditaria definida por la sustitución progresiva de miocardio ventricular derecho por tejido fibroadiposo. Es causa frecuente de la muerte súbita de jóvenes atletas. El objetivo del presente estudio es conocer la incidencia de variantes desmosómicas patogénicas o probablemente patogénicas en pacientes con MCAVD definitiva de alto riesgo. Métodos: El estudio de cohortes retrospectivo observacional incluyó a 36 pacientes diagnosticados de MCAVD definitiva de alto riesgo en nuestro hospital entre enero de 1998 y enero de 2015. El análisis genético se realizó con next-generation sequencing. Resultados: La mayoría eran varones (28 pacientes, 78%) con una media de edad al diagnóstico de 45 ± 18 años. Se detectó al menos 1 variante desmosómica patogénica o probablemente patogénica en 26 de los 35 casos índice (74%): 5 nonsense, 14 frameshift, 1 splice y 6 missense. En 15 pacientes (71%) se encontraron mutaciones nuevas. La presencia o la ausencia de mutaciones desmosómicas o la naturaleza de estas no se asociaron con características electrocardiográficas, clínicas, arrítmicas, anatómicas o pronósticas específicas. Conclusiones: La incidencia de variantes desmosómicas patogénicas o probablemente patogénicas en MCAVD definitiva de alto riesgo fue muy alta, con mayoría de mutaciones que causan truncamiento. La presencia de mutaciones desmosómicas no se asoció con el pronóstico

Introduction and objectives: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is an inherited cardiomyopathy characterized by progressive fibrofatty replacement of predominantly right ventricular myocardium. This cardiomyopathy is a frequent cause of sudden cardiac death in young people and athletes. The aim of our study was to determine the incidence of pathological or likely pathological desmosomal mutations in patients with high-risk definite ARVC. Methods: This was an observational, retrospective cohort study, which included 36 patients diagnosed with high-risk ARVC in our hospital between January 1998 and January 2015. Genetic analysis was performed using next-generation sequencing. Results: Most patients were male (28 patients, 78%) with a mean age at diagnosis of 45 ± 18 years. A pathogenic or probably pathogenic desmosomal mutation was detected in 26 of the 35 index cases (74%): 5 nonsense, 14 frameshift, 1 splice, and 6 missense. Novel mutations were found in 15 patients (71%). The presence or absence of desmosomal mutations causing the disease and the type of mutation were not associated with specific electrocardiographic, clinical, arrhythmic, anatomic, or prognostic characteristics. Conclusions: The incidence of pathological or likely pathological desmosomal mutations in ARVC is very high, with most mutations causing truncation. The presence of desmosomal mutations was not associated with prognosis

Impact of dynamic physical exercise on high-risk definite arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.

INTRODUCTION: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D) is an inherited cardiomyopathy characterized by ventricular arrhythmias and heart failure. The variable phenotype suggesting that determined environmental factors may have an influence. The aim of our study was to discover the impact of the dynamic physical activity on patients with high-risk definite ARVC/D. METHODS AND RESULTS: Collection of data on physical activity at the time of diagnosis was conducted at an in-person clinical interview. The intensity of the activity was classified in accordance with the mean frequency of weekly physical exercise sessions in the 10 years before diagnosis and into the following three groups of dynamic activity: high/competitive (>3 h/wk), moderate (1 to 3 h) and minimal/inactive (<1 h). Seventeen patients practiced high dynamic physical activities. The intensity of dynamic activity was classified into three groups: 8 of high intensity, 9 moderate, and 19 inactive. The first major arrhythmic event and occurrence of severe right ventricular dysfunction were earlier in the high-intensity exercise group, followed by the moderate intensity group and at a later age in the low-intensity/inactive group. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic exercise could be directly associated with the severity of the phenotype in relation to the precocity of major ventricular arrhythmic events and right ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with high-risk definite ARVC/D.

Usefulness of Genetic Study by Next-generation Sequencing in High-risk Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is an inherited cardiomyopathy characterized by progressive fibrofatty replacement of predominantly right ventricular myocardium. This cardiomyopathy is a frequent cause of sudden cardiac death in young people and athletes. The aim of our study was to determine the incidence of pathological or likely pathological desmosomal mutations in patients with high-risk definite ARVC. METHODS: This was an observational, retrospective cohort study, which included 36 patients diagnosed with high-risk ARVC in our hospital between January 1998 and January 2015. Genetic analysis was performed using next-generation sequencing. RESULTS: Most patients were male (28 patients, 78%) with a mean age at diagnosis of 45 ± 18 years. A pathogenic or probably pathogenic desmosomal mutation was detected in 26 of the 35 index cases (74%): 5 nonsense, 14 frameshift, 1 splice, and 6 missense. Novel mutations were found in 15 patients (71%). The presence or absence of desmosomal mutations causing the disease and the type of mutation were not associated with specific electrocardiographic, clinical, arrhythmic, anatomic, or prognostic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of pathological or likely pathological desmosomal mutations in ARVC is very high, with most mutations causing truncation. The presence of desmosomal mutations was not associated with prognosis.

Comparison of the new risk prediction model (HCM Risk-SCD) and classic risk factors for sudden death in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and defibrillator.

AIMS: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is one of the main causes of sudden death in young people. Recent clinical practice guidelines include a risk prediction model for sudden death (HCM Risk-SCD), which facilitates the decision of whether to implant a defibrillator. The aim of our study was to ascertain the percentage of events in our series of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and whether HCM Risk-SCD predicts the onset of arrhythmic events. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was an observational, retrospective cohort study, which included 48 primary prevention defibrillator recipient patients with HCM. We compiled their demographic and clinical characteristics, estimated 5-year risk using HCM Risk-SCD, and collected the documentation on arrhythmias during follow-up. The majority was male (66.7%) and mean age at implantation was 44.44 ± 14.46 years. Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia was the most prevalent risk factor (66.67%), followed by a family history of sudden death (47.92%). Mean HCM Risk-SCD was 6.15 ± 5.01%. HCM Risk-SCD was the only factor independently associated with the onset of ventricular tachyarrhythmia, above any other classic risk factor or association [odds ratio = 1.46 (95% confidence interval 1.051-2.013); P = 0.02]. None of the 11 patients estimated as low risk using HCM Risk-SCD suffered any appropriate events (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: During an average follow-up of 4 years, 16.67% presented appropriate events (4.16%/year). HCM Risk-SCD predicted the onset of events more suitably than classic risk factors.

Improvement in hemodynamic response using a quadripolar LV lead.

BACKGROUND: The Quartet quadripolar lead (St. Jude Medical Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA) offers 10 different left ventricle pacing configurations that may further influence hemodynamic parameters compared to traditional bipolar pacing configurations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether pacing from additional quadripolar lead vectors could enhance cardiac output (CO). METHODS: For each patient, CO was measured in "no-pacing" and in all the 10 configurations available, within 7 days of implantation of the device. Tip-ring, tip-right ventricular coil (RVC), and ring-RVC vectors were considered as traditional vectors. The seven additional configurations available in the quadripolar lead were considered as nontraditional vectors. CO was measured by ECHO. The best configuration was defined as the one presenting the highest CO measurement within configurations, which have a capture threshold <3 V and a safety margin between the capture and the phrenic nerve stimulation thresholds. RESULTS: Fifty-one standard cardiac resynchronization therapy patients were enrolled. The mean of each patient's best CO obtained with traditional vectors was higher than the baseline nonpaced CO (4.16 L/min vs 3.64 L/min). The mean of each patient's best CO, including all 10 available configurations, was also higher than the baseline nonpaced CO (4.33 L/min vs 3.64 L/min). In addition, the mean of each patient's best CO obtained with the best configuration available through a quadripolar lead was better than the mean of each patient's best CO obtained with a traditional configuration. In 53% of patients, the best CO was obtained with a nontraditional vector unique to the quadripolar lead. CONCLUSIONS: A quadripolar lead offers multiple additional pacing options to increase CO acutely compared to conventional bipolar leads.

Remodelado inverso ecocardiográfico y eléctrico en terapia de resincronización cardiaca / Echocardiographic and electrical reverse remodeling in cardiac resynchronization therapy

No disponible

Factors predicting and having an impact on the need for a permanent pacemaker after CoreValve prosthesis implantation using the new Accutrak delivery catheter system.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the need for a permanent pacemaker after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the CoreValve prosthesis (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota) using the new Accutrak delivery system (Medtronic, Inc.). BACKGROUND: The need for a permanent pacemaker is a recognized complication after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the CoreValve prosthesis. METHODS: Between April 23, 2008 and May 31, 2011, 195 consecutive patients with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis. In 124 patients, the traditional delivery system was used, and in 71 patients, the Accutrak delivery system was used. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline electrocardiographic characteristics between the traditional system and the Accutrak patients: PR interval: 153 ± 46 mm versus 165 ± 30 mm, p = 0.12; left bundle branch block: 22 (20.2%) versus 8 (12.7%), p = 0.21; right bundle branch block: 21 (19.3%) versus 8 (12.7%), p = 0.26. The depth of the prosthesis in the left ventricular outflow tract was greater with the traditional system than with the Accutrak system (9.6 ± 3.2 mm vs. 6.4 ± 3 mm, p < 0.001) and the need for a permanent pacemaker was higher with traditional system than with Accutrak (35.1% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.003). The predictors of the need for a pacemaker were the depth of the prosthesis in the left ventricular outflow tract (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08 to 1.34, p < 0.001), pre-existing right bundle branch block (HR: 3.5, 95% CI: 1.68 to 7.29, p = 0.001), and use of the traditional system (HR: 27, 95% CI: 2.81 to 257, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The new Accutrak delivery system was associated with less deep prosthesis implantation in the left ventricular outflow tract, which could be related to the lower rate of permanent pacemaker requirement.

Changes in atrioventricular conduction and predictors of pacemaker need after percutaneous implantation of the CoreValve®. Aortic valve prosthesis.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Although changes in atrioventricular conduction frequently occur after percutaneous implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis, little is known about the mechanisms involved or how these changes progress. We investigated ECG abnormalities and predictors of pacemaker need after percutaneous implantation of the CoreValve® aortic valve prosthesis. METHODS: Between April 2008 and October 2009, 65 patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis received a CoreValve® prosthesis. Clinical and ECG parameters were recorded and predictors of pacemaker need due to advanced atrioventricular block were investigated. The analysis excluded three patients because they had pacemakers and a fourth who died during the procedure. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 79 ± 7.8 years and their logistic EuroSCORE was 20 ± 14%. Implantation was successful in 98.4%. After implantation, 47.5% had left bundle branch block and 21 patients (34.4%) required a permanent pacemaker. The need for a pacemaker was associated with a greater depth of prosthesis implantation in the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT): 13 ± 2.5 mm vs. 8.8 ± 2.8 mm (P< .001). Moreover, depth was the only predictor: odds ratio 1.9, 95% confidence interval 1.19-3.05 (P< .007). A cutpoint of 11.1 mm for the prosthesis depth in the LVOT had a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 84.6% for predicting the need for a pacemaker. CONCLUSIONS: After CoreValve® aortic valve prosthesis implantation, a high percentage of patients needed a permanent pacemaker for advanced atrioventricular block. The only independent predictor was the depth of the prosthesis in the LVOT, which could serve as an early indicator of pacemaker need.

Alteraciones de la conducción auriculoventricular y predictores de la necesidad de marcapasos tras el implante percutáneo de la prótesis aórtica de CoreValve® / Changes in atrioventricular conduction and predictors of pacemaker need after percutaneous implantation of the CoreValve® aortic valve prosthesis

Introducción y objetivos. Los cambios en la conducción auriculoventricular son frecuentes tras el implante percutáneo de la prótesis aórtica, pero se desconoce qué mecanismos están implicados y su evolución. Analizamos las alteraciones electrocardiográficas y los predictores de la necesidad de marcapasos tras el implante percutáneo con la prótesis aórtica CoreValve®. Métodos. Entre abril de 2008 y octubre de 2009 se ha tratado a 65 pacientes con estenosis aórtica grave sintomática mediante la prótesis aórtica CoreValve®. Se analizaron características clínicas y electrocardiográficas y predictores de la necesidad de marcapasos por bloqueo auriculoventricular avanzado. Del análisis se excluyó a 3 pacientes por tener marcapasos y a un cuarto paciente que falleció durante el procedimiento. Resultados. La media de edad era 79 ± 7,8 años y el EuroSCORE logístico, 20% ± 14%. El éxito del implante fue del 98,4%. Tras el implante de la prótesis, el 47,5% tenía bloqueo de rama izquierda y 21 pacientes (34,4%) precisaron de marcapasos definitivo. La necesidad de marcapasos se relacionó con la mayor profundidad de la prótesis en el tracto de salida del ventrículo izquierdo (TSVI) (13 ± 2,5 frente a 8,8 ± 2,8 mm; p < 0,001) y fue el único predictor (odds ratio = 1,9; intervalo de confianza del 95%, 1,19-3,05; p < 0,007. Una profundidad de 11,1 mm de la prótesis en el TSVI presentó una sensibilidad del 81% y una especificidad del 84,6% para predecir la necesidad de marcapasos. Conclusiones. Tras el implante de la prótesis aórtica CoreValve®, un alto porcentaje de pacientes precisan de marcapasos definitivo por bloqueo auriculoventricular avanzado. El único predictor independiente es la profundidad de la prótesis en el TSVI y podría detectar precozmente la necesidad de marcapasos (AU)

Introduction and objectives. Although changes in atrioventricular conduction frequently occur after percutaneous implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis, little is known about the mechanisms involved or how these changes progress. We investigated ECG abnormalities and predictors of pacemaker need after percutaneous implantation of the CoreValve® aortic valve prosthesis. Methods. Between April 2008 and October 2009, 65 patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis received a CoreValve® prosthesis. Clinical and ECG parameters were recorded and predictors of pacemaker need due to advanced atrioventricular block were investigated. The analysis excluded three patients because they had pacemakers and a fourth who died during the procedure. Results. The patients’ mean age was 79±7.8 years and their logistic EuroSCORE was 20±14%. Implantation was successful in 98.4%. After implantation, 47.5% had left bundle branch block and 21 patients (34.4%) required a permanent pacemaker. The need for a pacemaker was associated with a greater depth of prosthesis implantation in the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT): 13±2.5 mm vs. 8.8±2.8 mm (P<.001). Moreover, depth was the only predictor: odds ratio 1.9, 95% confidence interval 1.19- 3.05 (P<.007). A cutpoint of 11.1 mm for the prosthesis depth in the LVOT had a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 84.6% for predicting the need for a pacemaker. Conclusions. After CoreValve® aortic valve prosthesis implantation, a high percentage of patients needed a permanent pacemaker for advanced atrioventricular block. The only independent predictor was the depth of the prosthesis in the LVOT, which could serve as an early indicator of pacemaker need (AU)

[Benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation who have not undergone atrioventricular node ablation]. / Beneficio de la terapia de resincronización cardiaca en la fibrilación auricular sin ablación del nodo.

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on left ventricular function and reverse remodeling in patients in sinus rhythm with the effects in patients with atrial fibrillation who have not undergone atrioventricular node ablation. Echocardiographic and clinical parameters were evaluated at baseline and after 6 months of cardiac resynchronization therapy in 55 patients: 15 had atrial fibrillation and 40 were in sinus rhythm. Device programming was similar in the 2 groups, as were the reductions in QRS interval and echocardiographic measures of asynchrony observed after implantation. However, although significant improvements in end-systolic volume and ejection fraction were seen in both groups, reverse remodeling was greater in patients in sinus rhythm (reduction in end-systolic volume 30.9%+/-24.6% vs 12.5%+/-18.6%; P=.024), as was the relative increase in ejection fraction (15.4%+/-12.6% vs 5.0%+/-7.2%; P=.010). Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation who had not undergone atrioventricular node ablation resulted in significant improvements in ejection fraction and reverse remodeling, but these were less than those observed in patients in sinus rhythm.

Beneficio de la terapia de resincronización cardiaca en la fibrilación auricular sin ablación del nodo / Benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation who have not undergone atrioventricular node ablation

El objetivo fue comparar el efecto de la terapia de resincronización cardiaca en la función ventricular y el remodelado inverso en pacientes en ritmo sinusal y fibrilación auricular sin ablación del nódulo auriculoventricular. Se analizaron parámetros clínicos y ecocardiográficos antes y 6 meses tras la resincronización de 55 pacientes: 15 en fibrilación auricular y 40 en ritmo sinusal. La programación del dispositivo, el estrechamiento del QRS y la asincronía ecocardiográfica tras el implante fueron similares en ambos grupos. Sin embargo, aunque en ambos grupos se observó mejoría significativa del volumen telesistólico y la fracción de eyección, los pacientes en ritmo sinusal presentaron mayor remodelado inverso (reducción del volumen telesistólico del 30,9% ± 24,6% contra el 12,5% ± 18,6%; p = 0,024) y aumento relativo en la fracción de eyección (el 15,4% ± 12,6% y el 5% ± 7,2%; p = 0,010). La terapia de resincronización en pacientes con fibrilación auricular sin ablación del nódulo mejora significativamente la fracción de eyección y el remodelado inverso, pero menos que en ritmo sinusal

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on left ventricular function and reverse remodeling in patients in sinus rhythm with the effects in patients with atrial fibrillation who have not undergone atrioventricular node ablation. Echocardiographic and clinical parameters were evaluated at baseline and after 6 months of cardiac resynchronization therapy in 55 patients: 15 had atrial fibrillation and 40 were in sinus rhythm. Device programming was similar in the 2 groups, as were the reductions in QRS interval and echocardiographic measures of asynchrony observed after implantation. However, although significant improvements in end-systolic volume and ejection fraction were seen in both groups, reverse remodeling was greater in patients in sinus rhythm (reduction in end-systolic volume 30.9%±24.6% vs 12.5%±18.6%; P=.024), as was the relative increase in ejection fraction (15.4%±12.6% vs 5.0%±7.2%; P=.010). Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation who had not undergone atrioventricular node ablation resulted in significant improvements in ejection fraction and reverse remodeling, but these were less than those observed in patients in sinus rhythm

Repercussion of functional mitral regurgitation on reverse remodelling in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces the degree of functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). However, FMR has also been associated with a lack of clinical response to CRT. We undertook this study to determine whether the presence of FMR influences the reverse remodelling induced by CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used Doppler echocardiography to assess 20 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy before and 6 months after undergoing CRT. We evaluated the effect of reverse remodelling (reduction > or = 10% in end-systolic volume) according to the presence or absence of important FMR, defined as a regurgitant orifice area (ROA) of > or = 0.20 cm(2). Of the 20 patients (mean age, 64.7 +/- 8.2 years, eight women), 9 had marked FMR (ROA 0.40 +/- 0.12 cm(2)), 6 mild FMR (ROA 0.15 +/- 0.02 cm(2)), and 5 had trivial or no FMR. CRT reduced the presence of mitral regurgitation by 33.3% and induced reverse remodelling in 60% of the patients. A ROA > or = 0.20 cm(2) was associated with a lack of reverse remodelling, despite presenting similar baseline characteristics and a reduction in asynchrony to the other patients. Reverse remodelling was produced in all the other patients, with a significant reduction in end-systolic volume (41.7 +/- 21%; P = 0.003), accompanied by improvement in the ejection fraction (P = 0.003) and myocardial performance index (P = 0.027). CONCLUSION: CRT improved FMR, although the baseline presence of important mitral regurgitation, with a ROA > or = 0.20 cm(2), in patients undergoing CRT was associated with a lack of response in reverse remodelling.